Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Honda Accord 1999

 
Mitsubishi Lancer
1996 - 2001
Honda Accord
1999 - 2001
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP116 HP
Torque: 108 NM140 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.8 seconds12.1 seconds
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 41 HP less power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.08.1
Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway950 km on highway
Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.60 m
Width: 1.69 m1.75 m
Height: 1.40 m1.43 m
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller.
Mitsubishi Lancer is 30 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data450 litres
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0501`770
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • better manoeuvrability
Honda Accord has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv