Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 and Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer 1994, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 27 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer 1994, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`050 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |