Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004

 
Mitsubishi Lancer
1996 - 2001
Mitsubishi Lancer
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP82 HP
Torque: 108 NM120 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.8 seconds13.7 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer 2004, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer 2004. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.06.5
The Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 could require 225 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway940 km on highway
Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 27 years27 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi ColtInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt, Mitsubishi Space Star
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.48 m
Width: 1.69 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.45 m
Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is smaller.
Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is 18 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer 2004, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data430 litres
Turning diameter: 10.2 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`0501`750
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1200
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Lancer has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv