Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Toyota Corolla. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Colt | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer and Toyota Corolla are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`050 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |