Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Honda Accord 1999
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 41 HP less power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 30 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`050 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Honda Accord has
| |