Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer 2004, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer 2004. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Colt | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt, Mitsubishi Space Star | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is 18 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer 2004, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`050 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |