Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer 2007 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 engine produces 34 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer 2007, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer 2007. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer 2007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer 2007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer 2007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer 2007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 310'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Colt | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Colt, Smart ForFour, Mitsubishi Xpander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is 27 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer 2007, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer 2007. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`050 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |