Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Honda Accord 2003

 
Mitsubishi Lancer
2004 - 2007
Honda Accord
2003 - 2005
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 135 HP155 HP
Torque: 176 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds9.9 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Honda Accord. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.48.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km8.5 l/100km
By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway950 km on highway
580 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 520'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Lancer engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 45 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space WagonInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mitsubishi Lancer engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ...  More about Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.75 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller.
Mitsubishi Lancer is 27 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres572 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1657 litres
Honda Accord has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Lancer has 142 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7502`030
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 12001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.7/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Honda Accord has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv