Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Toyota Yaris 2007
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 2 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Lancer engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine: This engine is generally considered decent, with a lifespan of around 250,000 km. While it doesn’t cause major issues if properly maintained, some common problems still arise.
One of the most frequent ... More about Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer is 68 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 275 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Lancer has 155 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 10.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |