Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer 2008, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer 2008. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.1 | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer 2008, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer 2008. The Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |