Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Hyundai Elantra 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 135 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 176 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Hyundai Elantra is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 8 HP less power than Hyundai Elantra, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Hyundai Elantra. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.1 | |
The Hyundai Elantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Hyundai Elantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai Elantra, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 460 litres | |
Hyundai Elantra has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer has 30 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`810 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |