Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1997

 
Mitsubishi Lancer
2004 - 2007
Mitsubishi Carisma
1997 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 98 HP100 HP
Torque: 150 NM137 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.6 seconds15 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma, but torque is 13 NM more than Mitsubishi Carisma. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.98.3
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Engine production duration: 14 years15 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi Space StarUsed also on Mitsubishi Lancer
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mitsubishi Lancer engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.71 m
Height: 1.45 m1.40 m
Mitsubishi Lancer and Mitsubishi Carisma are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data460 litres
Mitsubishi Carisma has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Lancer has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma.
Turning diameter: no data10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7501`630
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1200800
Rating in user reviews: 8.7/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mitsubishi Carisma has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv