Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Honda Civic 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 27 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.1 | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Lancer is 7 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 389 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Lancer has 41 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. The Honda Civic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Honda Civic has
| |