Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Ford Focus 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 11 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Ford Focus. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Star | Used also on Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 15 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 526 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 931 litres | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer has 96 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Ford Focus has
| |