Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 146 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 22 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, but torque is 4 NM more than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Star | Used also on Alfa Romeo 147 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer is 4 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 156, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 378 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Lancer has 52 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Alfa Romeo 156 has
| |