Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Rover 45 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Rover 45 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 2 HP less power than Rover 45, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Rover 45. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 45 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 45, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 45. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 45 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Star | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Land Rover Freelander, Rover 25 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Lancer is 4 cm shorter than the Rover 45, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
|
Rover 45 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer has 40 litres less trunk space than the Rover 45. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Rover 45 has
| |