Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Rover 45 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 45 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 19 HP less power than Rover 45, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Rover 45. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 8.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 45, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Star | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Rover 75, Rover 25 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Lancer is 4 cm shorter than the Rover 45, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
|
Rover 45 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer has 40 litres less trunk space than the Rover 45. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Rover 45 has
| |