Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Kia Cerato 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 98 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 143 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Kia Cerato is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 7 HP less power than Kia Cerato, but torque is 7 NM more than Kia Cerato. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
680 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Star | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
Mitsubishi Lancer and Kia Cerato are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 381 litres | |
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Lancer has 49 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`720 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |