Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Chevrolet Nubira 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 24 HP less power than Chevrolet Nubira, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Chevrolet Nubira. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Nubira, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Nubira. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Nubira gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Nubira, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`193 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Chevrolet Nubira has
| |