Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 68 HP less power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 59 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Galant engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt, Mitsubishi Space Star | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Galant engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Lancer is 15 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1400 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 5.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |