Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.0 | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Yaris engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt, Mitsubishi Space Star | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine: Engines with higher mileage tend to lose oil both through combustion and leaks, with consumption becoming noticeable past 150,000 km. Around the same time, the timing chain may stretch as the hydraulic ... More about Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer is 73 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 275 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Lancer has 155 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 10.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |