Mitsubishi Lancer 2007 vs Volvo S60 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Lancer) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volvo S60) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S60, but torque is 80 NM more than Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 9.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volvo S60 2004 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo S60 2004 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1034 litres | |
|
Volvo S60 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer has 24 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |