Mitsubishi Lancer 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer and Mitsubishi Outlander have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer has 141 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |