Mitsubishi Lancer 2007 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 10 HP less power than Chevrolet Cruze, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Chevrolet Cruze. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Cruze, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer has 50 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Chevrolet Cruze has
| |