Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 vs Mercedes C class 2007

 
Mitsubishi Lancer
2008 - 2010
Mercedes C class
2007 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 143 HP184 HP
Torque: 178 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds8.8 seconds
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 41 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.78.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km9.3 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway1040 km on highway
710 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Lancer) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 10 years13 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi ASXInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mercedes C class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Mercedes C klase 2007 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ...  More about Mercedes C klase 2007 1.8 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.77 m
Height: 1.49 m1.45 m
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 400 litres475 litres
Mercedes C class has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Lancer has 75 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`850 kg1`990 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 20004600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mercedes C klase has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv