Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 vs Hyundai i30 2011
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 17 HP more power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Hyundai i30. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2011 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer is 29 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Lancer has 60 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |