Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 2 HP more power than Chevrolet Cruze, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Chevrolet Cruze. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Cruze is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Cruze gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi ASX | Used also on Chevrolet Orlando | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Cruze, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer has 50 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`793 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Chevrolet Cruze has
| |