Mitsubishi Lancer 2007 vs Hyundai i30 2011
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 17 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Hyundai i30. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.9 | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 310'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Colt, Smart ForFour, Mitsubishi Xpander | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2011 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer is 29 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Lancer has 60 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |