Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 140 HP | 72 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 167 NM | 120 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 16.2 seconds | 10.2 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.9 | 6.3 - 8.7 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Mitsubishi Lancer equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`019 | ~ 1`609 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |