Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 vs Opel Corsa 1993

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Lancer
1994 - 1996
Opel Corsa
1993 - 1997
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.01.2 - 1.7

Performance

Power: 68 - 140 HP45 - 109 HP
Torque: 108 - 167 NM88 - 150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 16.2 seconds9.5 - 20 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.1 - 7.95.2 - 8.5
On average, the Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Opel Corsa. On average, Mitsubishi Lancer equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m3.73 m
Width: 1.68 m1.61 m
Height: 1.38 m1.42 m
Mitsubishi Lancer is larger, but slightly lower.
Mitsubishi Lancer is 55 cm longer than the Opel Corsa, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1050 litres
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Corsa.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`019~ 1`407
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons:
    Opel Corsa has
    • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv