Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 140 HP | 84 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 167 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 16.2 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.9 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Mitsubishi Lancer equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`019 | ~ 1`796 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |