Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 vs Honda Civic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 140 HP | 90 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 167 NM | 124 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 16.2 seconds | 8.1 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.9 | 6.8 - 8.4 | |
|
On average, the Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 18 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`019 | ~ 1`594 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Honda Civic has
| |