Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer is available only with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Galant can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 178 - 363 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 15.8 seconds | 8.2 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.0 | 7.0 - 11.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Galant. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 35 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`050 | ~ 1`851 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |