Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 82 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 120 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 15.8 seconds | 9.2 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.0 | 5.4 - 8.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Carisma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`050 | ~ 1`673 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |