Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Honda Accord 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 105 - 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 140 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 15.8 seconds | 9.8 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.0 | 6.4 - 9.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 30 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`050 | ~ 1`914 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Honda Accord has
| |