Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 108 - 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 15.8 seconds | 7.6 - 16.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.0 | 6.1 - 7.9 | |
|
On average, the Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mitsubishi Lancer 1994. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer 1994, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`050 | ~ 1`019 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |