Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 135 HP | 90 - 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 176 NM | 130 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 13.7 seconds | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.4 | 4.8 - 7.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 473 litres | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Lancer has 43 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Lancer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`694 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |