Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer is available only with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Galant can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 135 HP | 90 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 176 NM | 178 - 363 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 13.7 seconds | 8.2 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.4 | 7.0 - 11.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Galant. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Lancer is 17 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1400 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`851 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 5.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |