Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 135 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 176 NM | 145 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 13.7 seconds | 9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.4 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 675 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Lancer has 17 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |