Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Hyundai Elantra 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 - 135 HP | 85 - 143 HP | |
Torque: | 120 - 176 NM | 148 - 255 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 13.7 seconds | 8.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.4 | 7.1 | |
Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Elantra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
Mitsubishi Lancer is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai Elantra, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 460 litres | |
Hyundai Elantra has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer has 30 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |