Mitsubishi Lancer 2007 vs Toyota Corolla 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 150 HP | 90 - 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 310 NM | 130 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 14 seconds | 10 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 8.4 | 4.9 - 6.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Mitsubishi Lancer equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Lancer has 50 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Lancer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`831 | ~ 1`793 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |