Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1996 vs Toyota Celica 1995
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 302 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 38 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 51 NM more than Toyota Celica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.5 | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 21 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 9 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 208 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`785 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |