Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1996 vs Suzuki Baleno 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 159 HP more power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 201 NM more than Suzuki Baleno. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 7.7 | |
|
The Suzuki Baleno is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Suzuki Baleno gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 6 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 11 cm longer than the Suzuki Baleno, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |