Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1996 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994

 
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
1996 - 1998
Mitsubishi Lancer
1994 - 1996
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 280 HP140 HP
Torque: 353 NM167 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.6 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 140 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 186 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.87.9
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 285 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 510 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km520'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Lancer engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 20 years23 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on Mitsubishi Carisma
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.33 m4.28 m
Width: 1.69 m1.68 m
Height: 1.42 m1.38 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`045
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 22 800no data
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv