Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1996 vs Kia Sephia 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 200 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 233 NM more than Kia Sephia. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 7.9 | |
|
The Kia Sephia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Kia Sephia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 5 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1.1 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |