Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1998 vs Ford Escort 1995

 
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
1998 - 1999
Ford Escort
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 280 HP105 HP
Torque: 372.6 NM153 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.9 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 175 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 219.6 NM more than Ford Escort.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.08.1
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 285 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 500 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.35 m4.29 m
Width: 1.77 m1.68 m
Height: 1.42 m1.35 m
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is larger.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 6 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1 metres more than that of the Ford Escort, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Ford Escort has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv