Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1998 vs Rover 400 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 372.6 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 144 HP more power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 187.6 NM more than Rover 400. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.6 | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Rover 400 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Rover 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 14 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.7 metres more than that of the Rover 400, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Rover 400 has
| |