Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1999 vs Volvo S40 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 144 HP more power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 183 NM more than Volvo S40. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 8.1 | |
|
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 735 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 380 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S40 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Volvo V40 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 853 litres | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has 51 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 35 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |