Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1999 vs Toyota Celica 1995
Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 280 HP | 242 HP | |
Torque: | 373 NM | 302 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 38 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 71 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 9.5 | |
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 525 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 380 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 20 years | 21 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.35 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.30 m | |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 208 litres | |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has 212 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Celica. The Toyota Celica may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`785 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 35 800 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |