Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2002 vs Volvo S40 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 383 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 144 HP more power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 193 NM more than Volvo S40. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S40 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Volvo V40 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.41 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 853 litres | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has 41 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo S40, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |